• Service
  • Over ons
  • Leden
  • Vacatures
  • Contact
Duurzaamnieuws
  • Home
  • Nieuws
  • Kort nieuws
  • Inzicht
  • Opinie
  • Klimaat
  • Economie
  • Vakantie
  • Corona
  • Kantelpunten
  • Zoek
  • Menu Menu

Biden’s ‘democracy summit’ would be good for US – and EU

6 november 2020|dooreuobserver

joe biden

Europe will breathe a sigh of relief if Donald Trump vacates the White House. But what would Joe Biden bring? Christoph von Marshall from Germany's Der Tagesspiegel predicts that disappointment will quickly follow, as it did in 2009 after Barack Obama's election: "Each side expects that the other side changes, so it can continue its own policies".

The risk is real. Europe needs to define or adapt its positions in many areas. Many of these are already much discussed, such as relations with China and Russia, or defence spending.

However, there is another priority that Biden has announced that is not yet debated in Europe: democracy.

In his campaign pledge, Biden announced that within a year of taking office he would convene a global summit on democracy to "renew and the spirit and shared purpose of the nations of the free world".

Europe's usual reaction would be to half-heartedly joining the summit, showcase its many democracy support projects, in which is spends so much money, while privately moaning: why talk about democracy again? Is the US hinting at more invasions and regime changes? What does the US have the world to teach anyway after the Trump debacle?

The EU must avoid this reflex.

Our times are too serious and the question of democracy is too central to this century. If the forces of authoritarianism keep beating back democracy at the same rate as during the last 10 years, we are moving into even darker times.

Democracy is the underlying question of many EU foreign policy challenges, be they China, Russia or Turkey or internet governance. It would be even more so if Trump won a second term.

However, democracy remains far from our foreign policy strategy. In the last report on the EU´s global strategy, democracy only figures as a theme in EU-Africa relations, or on the question of how to deal with fragile states.

In a time of re-emerging ideological competition, democracy cannot be treated as a sideshow.

China and Russia long ago switched from a defensive game of 'don't interfere with our domestic politics', going on the offensive to interfere across the world to undermine democracies and ensure that more countries are dependent on them.

From Hong Kong to Belarus, they actively work to make sure that people cannot participate in politics and determine their own destiny.

Enough. The EU needs to include democracy as a central part of its foreign policy, both at home and abroad. According to Carnegie Europe, EU development funding is spent overwhelmingly in countries with hybrid regimes or autocracies. That´s wrong.

Democracies should automatically benefit from support and good relations with the EU. Attacking our democracies should carry a steep price.

Unfortunately, news of Russian disinformation campaigns against the EUtend to be shrugged off. They should instead be treated for what they are: the crossing of a red line.

Being on the side of democracy reflects our values. It also reflects our interests.

Democracies often appear to be unstable, because free media give us a clear sense of tension and struggles in society. But despite attempts to prove the opposite, authoritarian governments are less stable and more dangerous.

The Covid-19 emergency could have been avoided if China had free media to inform its citizens and the world of what was going on from the beginning.

The whole post-Soviet space is a hotbed of conflicts and uprisings as people's aspirations are blocked by authoritarian and corrupt governments.

The EU can take another page from Biden's pledge: he has not simply warmed up old US language on democracy.

His pledge is not triumphant, it does not involve a shining city on a hill. Instead, he pointedly talks about restoring democracy in the US and to shore up its global moral leadership before convening a global summit.

To be taken seriously, the EU should start by dealing with serious democracy problems in its member states.

The EU is not a club of democracies anymore. The Hungarian and Polish governments provide real-life lessons on how to destroy democracy's institutions, and they have plenty of eager students. Any attempt to paint a different picture would be hypocritical.

The EU's language on democracy should also change, moving away from vague and lofty language into specific and precise focus on how authoritarian governments and political parties undermine the rules of our democratic game.

Not 'populism', it's 'authoritarianism'

For example, instead of relying on vague discussions of 'populism', an unhelpful definition at the best of times, we need to refer to such forces by their real name: authoritarianism.

This makes it clear that the issues facing us are not a question of political opinion, but show what lies clearly beyond democracy's boundaries. Authoritarianism in its many forms is the main concern of democrats and should be for the EU.

Authoritarian governments try to construct civilisational conflicts in which democratic rules become less important. To undercut this rhetorical construction, the EU should signal clearly that democracy offers a place for anybody who respects the rules, whether someone is religious or not, progressive or conservative.

It should also stress that democracy has two sides: majority decision cannot overrule the protection of minorities.

There is no democracy without human rights and the rule of law. Likewise, human rights are not a straitjacket for democratic governments: they can straighten and change policy directions depending on electoral outcomes.

International law provides a rather calibrated balance of the competing concerns of the margin of manoeuvre for elected governments versus protecting rights of electoral and other minorities.

As the EU supports a rule-based international order, it should stress the role of international legal obligations as the foundation of a global debate on democracy.

The EU's foreign affairs chief Josep Borrell has used refreshingly clear and fresh language to explain European foreign policies. He should now give us straight-talk on democracy.

Michael Meyer-Resende

This article is published with courtesy of
euobserver

duurzaam nieuws en duurzame informatie op mastodon
  • Delen op Facebook
  • Delen op LinkedIn
  • Delen via e-mail
Goed dat je Duurzaamnieuws leest. Hier vind je breed inzicht in actuele ontwikkelingen rond duurzaamheid, klimaat en veiligheid. Dat bieden we onafhankelijk, zonder subsidies, overheidssteun of rijke aandeelhouders, maar vooral met hulp van bijdragen van onze lezers. We willen zo lang mogelijk onze informatie gratis aanbieden en voor iedereen toegankelijk houden, omdat het zo belangrijk is dat iedereen meedoet aan de omslag naar duurzaamheid en daar goed en eerlijk over geïnformeerd is.

Dit is een belangrijke tijd, waarin we de richting van de toekomst bepalen. Krijgen we klimaatverandering en de pandemie onder controle? Kunnen we onze veiligheid in stand houden? Nemen we de juiste maatregelen, ook voor een eerlijker samenleving? Als je kunt, is dit een mooi moment om ons te helpen. Steun ons als lid of donateur. Dank je wel.

Hier kun je lid worden.
En hier kun je doneren.



Wil je ons liever eerst een tijdje volgen? Meld je dan hier aan voor de gratis nieuwsbrief.

Alvast bedankt - en blijf veilig en gezond!
Team Duurzaamnieuws

Nieuws

  • Duurzaam de week door DDWD Duurzaam De Week Door 1226 maart 2023 - 14:45
  • air pollution EU houdt deur open voor auto’s op e-brandstoffen25 maart 2023 - 13:41
  • wilde bij Pesticiden veranderen gedrag van bijen meer bij warmer weer25 maart 2023 - 10:50
  • duurzaamheidsverslag Duurzaamheidsverslag wordt gemeengoed bij bedrijven25 maart 2023 - 10:39
  • misleidende reclame shell TNO: beperk reclame voor klimaatbelastende producten22 maart 2023 - 14:58

Inzicht

  • toekomst van ons voedselRegeneratieve landbouw moet concreter en beter meetbaar22 maart 2023 - 15:06
  • agro industrieZorgen groene subsidies voor meer protectionisme?19 maart 2023 - 14:19
  • plastic afval Wat kan ik daar nu aan doen?11 maart 2023 - 10:16

Opinie

  • nieuwe duurzaamheid houdt ons overeind We hebben een nieuwe duurzaamheid nodig4 januari 2023 - 17:01
  • ontmenselijking 2022 het jaar van ontmenselijking11 december 2022 - 11:00
  • Een sprong in de tijd9 november 2022 - 09:16
meewind 23 02

Duurzaamnieuws wordt mede mogelijk gemaakt door:

elektrischeautolease.nl - elektrische auto leasen

energie aanbiedingen
energie vergelijken

Service

  • Gratis nieuwsbrief
  • Lid worden
  • Doneren
  • Privacy policy
  • Blog
  • Mastodon

Rubrieken

  • Nieuws
  • Inzicht
  • Opinie
  • Info

Onderwerpen

  • Energie
  • Economie
  • Klimaat
  • Voeding
  • Hormoonverstoorders
  • Kantelpunten
  • Corona

Creative Commons-Licentie

CC uitsluitend van toepassing op tekst redactie. Overige content alle rechten voorbehouden aan auteurs / producenten.

Duurzaamnieuws, nieuws over duurzaamheid

is een uitgave van stichting iNSnet.

duurzaam nieuws en duurzame informatie op mastodon
duurzaam nieuws en duurzame informatie op facebook
duurzaam nieuws en duurzame informatie op twitter
duurzaam nieuws en duurzame informatie op rss
De 6 duurste spullen ooitBetekent Biden het einde van Big Business Luilekkerland?
Scroll naar bovenzijde

AVG Toestemmingen

Bij duurzaamnieuws.nl nemen wij uw recht op privacy serieus. Wij plaatsen enkele cookies die nodig zijn om onze website optimaal te laten functioneren. Onderstaand ziet u welke verplichte en optionele toestemmingen u ons verleent om uw persoongegevens te verwerken op deze website. Als u deze toestemmingen wilt intrekken klikt u op 'Vergeet mij' onderaan deze pagina.

Privacy verklaring | Sluiten
Instellingen